What was the Legacy of Empire?
From 10,000 kingdoms to 40
In 1880 there were 10,000 kingdoms in Africa. By 1900 there 40 states of which 36 were European with Britain controlling one third of the continent. Much of this division amongst the European nations had been accomplished peacefully at Berlin in 1884 when it was agreed that civilised powers had a right to seize, govern and civilise any part of Africa which was not already imperialised. Where necessary local tribes were controlled with the Maxim gun thus introducing the use and continual threat of violence that was to become an essential feature of imperialism. Not only were local tribes to be subdued by violence but the continual threat of violence should there be resistance to the new legal codes and customs introduced by the British brought a psychological feeling of inferiority.
Local traditions destroyed
In order to subdue a people the British sometimes resorted to destroying features
of the local culture in order to demonstrate British superiority and contempt for
local traditions. In 1860 a British-
The boundaries of the European states took no account of tribal boundaries. In Africa the division often meant boundaries followed lines of longitude and latitude thus leaving local tribes in two different states. Sometimes as with Kashmir, land was given to a local ally (in this case to a Hindu) which was fought over once the British left. Historians argue over who was to blame for what happened following the granting of independence to India and Pakistan but partition left millions dead.
Part of British imperialism was the mission to civilise. This meant westernising
the local culture. The learning of English was introduced and local customs banned.
The introduction of English gives former colonies like India an advantage on the
world's trading stage but for those in India who do not have access to an education
in English, they are possibly condemned to a second class existence. The introduction
of English also served to devalue local culture and languages. British culture and
the legal system gave men a dominant position in society. This was not always the
case in pre-
The motives of empire
The main motives for annexation throughout the history of the Empire was the acquisition of land suitable for agriculture or for potential raw materials. To transform economies the British built railways, roads and a telegraph system. The teaching of English was introduced into schools so that there was a section of the population that could help administer the country. Local economies might find their own subsistent economies being transformed into cash crop capitalist economies. This could leave local people without land as the terms of land ownership were often changed by the British. In the post 1945 world many former colonies have not been able to compete on the world market. In Jamaica for example the EU provides subsidies to enable EU countries to produce beet that undercuts the sugar Jamaica produces. If local people were deemed unsuited to the production of new crops or the mining of minerals the British imported labour which has had a huge impact on the world. The sweet tooth of the British saw the West Indies transformed into slave plantations and even after the abolition of slavery, indentured servants from India were introduced. Indentured servants were also brought in to South Africa and East Africa often resulting in a legacy of conflict between Indian communities and local peoples especially in Fiji, Kenya and Uganda.
An empire based on racism
The British Empire was based on an element of racism which has produced a legacy
of racism amongst the British community. Immigrants from the West Indies and Africa
were subjected to discrimination in the 1950s and 1960s and as late as the 1970s
migrants from South Asia were subjected to virginity tests, a legacy of imperial
attitudes to sexuality. The British Empire was portrayed from the end of the Napoleonic
Wars as an empire of liberty yet there was an intrinsic contradiction between this
contention and the reality which was that non-
The contradictions of empire
The contradictions of the British Empire were most apparent during the Cold War when the western world was told that there existed a conflict between the Soviet forces of oppression which had enslaved eastern Europe and the forces of freedom led by Britain and America. Franklin Roosevelt had wanted the European powers to dismantle their empires as they were not compatible with a post war democratic world but the perceived threat of the Soviet union persuaded the Americans that France and Britain were needed as allies in the Cold War. Britain and France could set their own agenda for decolonisation.
Britain tried to maintain its dominant position in the world by creating the Commonwealth,
The largest empire ever
The British Empire in 1901 was the largest empire the world had ever seen. It had
an impact not just on Britain but vast areas of the world -
Africa before and after European partition
Tea plantations were introduced into east Africa, India and Ceylon