In 1869 the Egyptian-
Britain’s dominance of Middle Eastern politics
When authority collapsed in Egypt in 1881 as a result of a military coup, Gladstone who had been very critical of imperial policies decided to occupy Egypt. From this time until the Suez crisis in 1956 Britain dominated Middle Eastern politics and when the Ottoman Empire was dismantled after WW1 Britain acquired the lion's share of its territories in the Palestine region. As oil became more and more important to the British economy so the hold on the Middle East was intensified.
With Britain's involvement in Egypt came a responsibility for Sudan, a virtual Egyptian colony, and when Britain decided to evacuate its forces from Sudan General Gordon was selected to undertake the task. His mission and death in Sudan was to capture the public imagination and was become part of the myth of British imperialism.
Route past the cape still important
The route to the Cape though was still considered important and when Lord Fisher became First Sea Lord in 1904 he declared that five ports controlled the whole world: Dover, Gibraltar, Alexandria, Cape Town and Singapore. The Suez Canal may have been opened in1869 but the Cape route remained important enough for Britain to go to war to protect her interest in the Cape in 1899.
Disraeli acquires a controlling interest in the cCanal
In 1875, Disraeli was able to buy a controlling interest in the company on behalf of the British government for £4 million by buying the 40% allocation of the ruler of Egypt who had gone bankrupt. The canal now became part of Britain's strategic interest.
The beginning of jingoism
The importance of the canal to Britain was made clear in 1877 when a Russian army invaded the Balkans following the brutal repression of a rebellion in Bulgaria by the Turkish authorities. A British fleet, including the most modern ship in the world, HMS Devastation, anchored in the Dardanelles and Indian troops were sent to Malta in preparation for a war between Russia and Britain. With war fever raging in the music halls, the song of the moment was:
We don't want to fight, but by jingo if we do,
We've got the ships; we've got the men; we've got the money too!
An army revolt in Egypt brings interest from Britain
The stability of Egypt was crucial to British strategic interests in the Middle East, and the ambition of Khedive Muhammad Ali seemed to be taking Egypt towards becoming a modern state. There had been investment in railways, cotton plantations, and irrigation as well as schools but by 1882 total debt totalled £100 million. Despite attempts by an international commission to keep the country solvent, internal dissension with international interference led to unrest and a revolt by army officers in February 1881 led by Urabi Pasha. In September 1881 he carried out a coup d'etat and made himself Minister of War with full control of the army.
The British were concerned at the possibility of an anti-
During August two armies, one of 24,000 troops from India and one of 7,000 from Britain and led by Wolseley converged on Egypt. Warships occupied the canal and the military force landed on 18 August at Ismailia. Four weeks later Urabi's camp at Tel-
Britain takes control of Egypt
Wolseley, embarrassed by his involvement, declared that Britain would oversee the regeneration of Egypt -
Taking responsibility for Egypt meant that Britain took over responsibility for the Egyptian colony of Sudan where Egyptian control was fragile. The Sudan was considered by Britain to be of strategic importance as it controlled the waters of the Nile -
In 1881 a revolt had broken out in the Sudan led by Muhammad Ahmad, a 30 year old holy man who referred to himself as the Mahdi. His message of spiritual rebirth appealed to the Sudanese people and so a British led Egyptian force was sent to the Sudan to deal with the revolt. The force though was defeated in November 1883 at Shaykan. One of the Mahdi's allies then opened up another front at the Red Sea port of Suakin. Gladstone's government decided to evacuate all Egyptian forces and sent general Gordan to oversee the withdrawal.
General Gordon killed
Gordon was a popular hero whose bravery and evangelical fervour appealed to the British public. Gordon saw himself as an agent of Providence answerable only to God. He had a particular talent for commanding non-
Wolseley's advance was cautious but an advance column crossing the desert was brought to battle at Abu Klea where in a short battle lasting twenty minutes they suffered heavy losses with the red square pierced but the Mahdist forces were driven off.
The relative success of the Mahdist forces in the desert encouraged the Mahdi to storm Khartoum which was taken on 28 January with Gordon killed in the fighting. The more romantic story of Gordon dying on steps was the result of unreliable sources but because it was regarded as a fitting end for a Christian soldier it was the version that became part of history.
The Fashoda Incident brought Britain and France to the brink of war
The Mahdi died a few months later and the Sudan was to pose little threat to Egypt in the following years. The Sudan and the headwaters of the Nile were to be an area competed for by Britain and France as Britain was concerned that Egypt's agriculture might be affected by any power controlling this area. Britain claimed the area by virtue of its position in Egypt but this was challenged by France in 1898 when the French sent a force under the command of Captain Marchand to Fashoda on the shores of the Upper Nile.
Captain Marchand had crossed the African continent from Brazzaville to Fashoda in a journey lasting 18 months. He then claimed Fashoda on behalf of France at a time when General Kitchener was in Sudan to quell an uprising. Kitchener claimed that the whole of the Sudan, including Fashoda, lay under Britain administration. There was a stand off until Salisbury put the Royal Navy on alert and the French accepted Salisbury's demands and withdrew Marchand. France renounced all claims to the Nile valley and the area remained under British control the more so following Kitchener's defeat of Sudanese forces.
The British government had previously sanctioned the retaking of the Sudan by a force commanded by Kitchener. Kitchener advanced slowly down the Nile using a railway that was constructed as they went. As the force got closer to the Khalifah's army of 60,000, British troops were sent out.
The Battle of Omdurman
The decisive battle was fought on 2 September 1898 on a plain near Omdurman. The Khalifah's army made a series of frontal attacks which were beaten off with long range rifle fire, machine guns and artillery which together killed 11,000 men and wounded a further 16,000. It was a massacre which showed the difference between European armies and native forces. Many of the Khalifah's leaders were summarily shot leading to MPs in the House of Commons demanding that Kitchener be denied his payment of £30,000 -
Britain the dominant power in the Middle East
With the defeat of the Khalifah's army and the settlement with the French following the Fashoda incident Britain remained the dominant European in the region and made all the more powerful after WW1 when the Ottoman Empire collapsed. The seaward route to India and the Far East through the Mediterranean and the Suez Canal was now well protected by a string of British territories (Gibraltar, Malta, Cyprus, Egypt and Sudan) and would remain so until threatened in WW2 by the airpower of the Axis forces.
The route to India was 5,000 miles shorter via the Suez canal
A British view of the Fashoda Incident
The Battle of Omdurman where 11,000 Sudanese were killed in a massacre which demonstrated the difference between European and native forces.
British influence in the Middle East grew as a result of the strategic importance of the Suez Canal.